|
In this page I decided to address the large Desert Solar
Electric Generation Plants. In California. The
US now intends to fill the Deserts with Solar Electric Generation Plants.
These plants have relatively large capacity ratings and will be placed at
various locations in the California desert. I suspect that some will not
get funded.
Albert Gore says we have enough solar,
wind, and geothermal energy systems to supply the nations need of
energy. So the solar plants offered below are a start. But a start to what? I
submit, it will be a start of the proof that solar plants will not do
the job. And it will take another ten years to prove it. The low capacity
factor of these plants and the failure of many will prove it. So let's get
started.
Below is the table of the current status of the proposed
solar projects in California deserts.
The lead agency to review and approve each of these
projects is the California Energy Commission (CEC). It is my
understanding that the CEC is not responsible for the technical viability of
these projects. The CEC is responsible only for the environmental
impact of each project. If they fail it is not the CEC's fault. And I
think many will fail. As is true of the the recently failed Solar Power
Tower at Daggett . California. We will have a lot of junk left in the
Desert after this effort is over. The total combined capacity of
these solar plants is 2,527 MWe.
|
|
Project Name
and
Applicant |
Location |
Size &
Technology |
Status
|
My Opinion
|
|
Victorville
2 Hybrid
Power
Project
City of
Victorville |
Victorville |
563 MW
513 NG
50 MW solar
Trough |
Under Review
AFC filed
2/28/07 |
Will Work
|
|
Tvanpah
Solar
Partners
Brightsource |
San
Bernardino
County |
400 MW
Tower power |
Under Review
AFC filed
8/31/07 |
Will Fail* |
|
Carrizo
Energy
Solar Farm
Carrizo
Energy LLC |
San
Luis
Obispo
county
|
177 MW
Compact
Linear
Fresnel
Reflectors |
Under Review
AFC filed
10/25/07
|
Will Fail**
|
|
Beacon
solar
Energy
Project
Beacon Solar
LLC |
Kern
County |
250 MW
Solar Trough |
AFC Filed
3/14/08
|
Will work
|
|
Hybrid
Gas-Solar
City of
Palmdale
|
Palmdale
|
570 MW
520 Natural
Gas
50 MW solar
Trough |
AFC Not Yet
Filed
|
Will Work |
|
Harper
Lake Solar
Harper lake
LLC |
San
Bernardino
County |
250 MW
Solar Trough
|
AFC not Yet
Filed
|
Will Work |
|
Stirling
Solar
Thermal One
Stirling
Energy Systems |
San
Bernardino
County
|
850 MW
34,000
Stirling
Engines |
AFC Not Yet
Filed
|
Very
Doubtful***
|
|
Stirling
Solar
Thermal Two
Stirling
Energy Systems |
Imperial
Valley |
900 MW
36,000
Stirling
Engines |
AFC Not Yet
Filed
|
Very
Doubtful***
|
|
OptiSolar
Photovoltaic Cells |
San Luis
Obispo
County
PG&E |
550 MWe |
Not Yet
Filed |
Will Work
|
|
Sun Power
Photovoltaic Cells |
San Luis
Obispo
County
PG&E |
250 MWe |
Not yet
Filed |
Will Work |
* I think that the systems marked with an asterisk will
have problems because they do not use an intermediate fluid to receive the
sun's energy to heat the feedwater entering the steam generator. This provides
a very stable well known energy balance. Steam Turbines are made to accept
well known steam inlet conditions. I do not think the systems with direct
hearing from the sun's energy to water- steam can be well known or controlled.
** These system marked with two asterisks suffer the same
problem as above. The 10 MWe Tower Power system at Daggett,
California started with the sun's ray's directed to the water in the tower
to produce steam., and it failed. Later they used a heat
transfer medium, but it also failed because the heat transfer medium froze
in the steam generators. They could have prevent this problem, but failed
to do so.
*** These are the Stirling systems, some 1,750 MWe
produced by 70,000 individual 25 kWe capacity machines. Can they actually
maintain this many machines? They need to learn how to manufacture and keep these
units in top shape. These units have no reserve energy capacity. If or
when the sun goes under cloud cover they would all drop out, requiring the
utility to have an enormous amount of spinning reserve power plants on standby.
|
The California
Environmental Quality Act requires special emphasis should be placed on
environmental resources. I wonder how this racks up with the need for
copious amounts of water to keep the panels clear?
( c) Knowledge of the
regional setting is critical to the assessment of environmental impacts.
Special emphasis should be placed on environmental resources that are rare
or unique to that region and would be affected by the project. The EIR must
demonstrate that the significant environmental impacts of the proposed
project were adequately investigated and discussed and it must permit the
significant effects of the project to be considered in the full
environmental context |
Apparently Solel has bought the
parabolic Mirror system at Kramer's junction and intends to build a giant
new solar plant in the Mojave Desert.
Solel Inc. is developing the 553 MW Mojave Solar
Park 1 (MSP-1), the world's largest solar thermal power plant, in California's
Mojave Desert. In July 2007, Solel Inc. concluded a 25 year Power Purchase
Agreement with Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) to provide it with electricity
from MSP-1. Solel will build MSP-1 using Solel 6, Solel's industry leading
solar thermal collector. MSP-1 will encompass nine square miles and will
provide PG&E with 1,388 gigawatts of energy annually at a price competitive with
plants powered by fossil fuels.
Of all of the desert solar
system, I think this one has the best chance of succeeding. The reason for this
is due to the fact that the solar panels heat a heat transfer fluid in
tubes running through the parabolic reflectors. The fluid is then stored in a
large tank and is pumped to a shell and tube stream generator that heats water
to steam for the turbine. This intermediate heat transfer fluid allows the
system to carry out a more controlled heat balance of the power plant system.
In a feasibility study performed by the Electric
Power Research Institute (EPRI) found that the most feasible solar
technology system currently available for a large scale plant is the parabolic
trough.
My comment: I agree with the above
statement. I think the reason for this is due to the use of an intermediate
heat transfer fluid. The parabolic trough heats this fluid which
then goes into a holding tank. The thermal properties of the fluid in the
holding tank are well known. This fluid is then pumped into the shell side of
the steam generator to heat the feedwater coming for the Rankine cycle of
the power plant. This makes it possible to have well known hot fluid thermal
conditions at the inlet to the steam generator. This provides good control
heat balance over the process of generating the steam conditions going to the
turbine. Generating steam is not a simple process. It requires well known
conditions of the heating process and feed water inlet parameters.
The above reasons are why I think the
Tower Power and Fresnel Panel systems will not be as successful as the parabolic
trough systems.
Moreover, the Parabolic Trough system is the
only a proven system in California over the last thirty years. The Tower
Power system at Daggett California was a dismal failure and it was abandoned.
At Kramer Junction,
California, there is a solar installation called SEGS (Solar Electric
Generating System, built by LUZ International), of which there are nine units.
SEGS uses an array of parabolic mirrors (see picture), laid out on north-south
axes to concentrate reflected sunlight onto a black tube through which therminol
flows.
The solar-trough array at Kramer Junction, California.
The
shiny surfaces
focus sunlight onto the black tubes that run along the
array. The
therminol fluid, thus heated, is pumped to a heat exchanger where it is used to
boil water for a (Rankine) steam cycle system. As the sun
moves from
east to west, the reflectors rotate so as to keep facing the
sun.
To operate
at peak efficiency the mirrors are pressure washed every ten to twenty days. If you
want a full explanation and analysis of the SEGS system go to the NREL.com site.
But be careful they are, in my opinion too optimist about the future of this
concept. Also they are not too free on relating the capacity factors of the
system. Low capacity factors are the bane of renewable energy systems. The
capacity factor of the SEGS plant when operating on solar energy alone is only 25 percent.
It appears that the parabolic trough
system has been adopted as the favorite for concentrating solar plants. Below is
a recent announcement for such a plant being built in Nevada
Assembly of the
parabolic-trough system components is underway for a 64-Megawatt Nevada plant,
which will generate enough electricity to power about 11,000 homes.
Here is what what the Department of Energy Thinks about the trough system.
Trough
systems are commercially available and in use today. However, because of the
very low cost of today's fossil fuels, they cannot yet compete on a
cost-of-electricity basis with fossil-based systems,. A favorable financing
arrangement—one likely to be stimulated by green power markets—could enable
parabolic troughs to begin to play a role in the marketplace, however. And as
global demand for clean energy sources rises, trough systems will become more
financially attractive.
The Linear Fresnel Reflector solar
System
The Carrizo Energy
Company intends to construct a 177 MWe Linear Fresnel Reflector System in
San Luis Obispo County, California. PG&E has contracted to take the energy
from this system.
It
should be noted that PG&E is not putting any money in this venture. They are
only taking the electric energy if any is ever produced. This is necessary due
to the CPUC forcing PG&E to go green.
The Project
design will incorporate Ausra's
proprietary CLFR technology to
concentrate solar energy on tubes in an
elevated receiver. The concentrated
solar energy boils water within a row of specially coated stainless steel tubes in an
insulated cavity to produce saturated
steam. The steam produced in the
receivers is collected in a series of pipes,
routed to steam drums, and then to the two
turbine generators. Steam used by the steam
turbines is condensed back to water and
returned to the solar field. The advantage of this design is that lenses are cheaper
than mirrors. Furthermore, if a material is chosen that has some flexibility,
then a less rigid frame is required to withstand wind load
Prototypes of Fresnel lenses concentrators have been produced for the collection of thermal energy
by
International Automated Systems. No full-scale thermal systems using Fresnel
lenses are known to be in operation.
i am surprised that some organizations will
back and finance this system considering that there is no real prototype in
existence. It seem to me that the panels on the desert floor are so
close together that power washing them will be very difficult. Also stainless
steel tubes are selected as the tube material to receive the sun's energy and heat the steam-water in the over
head Fresnel tubes arranged horizontally. In the US we do not
use stainless steel to receive heat and transport steam- water
because stainless steel cannot withstand impurities such as caustics in the water-steam systems.
I think they should have arranged the tubes
in a vertical direction with the down comer tubes in the center and
the heated tubes around the out side. This would provide a natural
circulation steam steam-water system and it does not require multiple
steam drums in series..
I cannot envision what kind of heat
transfer-heat balance they will get with the steam water mixture flowing
horizontally in the tubes.
PG&E makes huge solar deal
UTILITY PROJECT WOULD PUT FIVE POWER PLANTS IN MOJAVE
DESERT
Article Launched: 04/01/2008 01:34:35 AM PDT
Pacific Gas & Electric today will announce the
largest series of solar-power contracts in the utility's history. The deal, to
buy as much as 900 megawatts of electricity - or enough to power
540,000 California homes each year - involves five plants to be built during
the next decade.
If the solar-thermal power plants designed by
Oakland's BrightSource Energy become operational, a significant amount of
power for PG&E customers could come from the sun that beats down on the Mojave
Desert.
"From what I know, this is the biggest
commitment ever in the history of solar," said John Woolard, BrightSource
Energy's chief executive officer and president. "It's a fairly significant
undertaking on both sides."
Building all five plants in the Mojave will
cost $2 billion to $3 billion, Woolard said. The project, which faces
regulatory and financing hurdles, could mean 2,000 construction jobs, and
employ about 1,000 workers to operate the plants. PG&E didn't disclose
the financial details of the contracts
My comments: Matt Nauman is a fine
fellow, but as is true of most newspaper reporters, he knows nothing about
energy. In the first place PG&E did not buy 900 megawatt of electricity because
this is only the power rating of the 900 MWe facility, it is not
electrical energy. PG&E bought nothing, and has taken no financial liability.
PG&E will pay for the energy kWh produced by the BrightSource company's solar
power plant, if there ever is any. And the rate PG&W will pay has not been
determined.
PG&E must commit to buying energy
from solar plants as required by the State of California. If the rate is too
high the State must reimburse PG&E for part of the cost of energy. This means
you the tax payer will chip in.
As for a 900 MWe power plant. it
probably will never get built because it requires many financial backers for
such a project. Are there that many suckers out there? I think not.
Moreover, 900 MWe plant capacity
will only provide enough electric energy for 160,000 homes, not 540,000. And
they will have to power wash the panels every 10 days or so.
It appears that these these
plants will be the Tower power configuration. Perhaps the Brightsource Energy
Co. should visit the Tower Power Plant at Daggett, CA. They did not work
at all.
Review Process Begins for Solar Thermal Project in Kern
County
Sacramento - 5/22/08
The California Energy Commission today accepted an application to
build a 250-megawatt solar thermal generating complex in Kern County.
By a vote of 5-0, the Commission said it has enough information to
begin the review of the Beacon Solar Energy Project proposed by a wholly owned
subsidiary of Florida Power and Light Company. After finding the application for
certification (AFC) from Delaware-based Beacon Solar LLC "data adequate," the
Commission assigned a committee of two to lead the 12-month review of the
proposed plant. Commission staff will now begin the data discovery and analysis
phase of the licensing process. Commissioner Karen Douglas will head the
committee that will ensure that the project meets the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act. Commissioner Jeff Byron will serve as the
Associate Member.
Beacon Solar LLC plans to develop the project on
the western edge of the Mojave Desert along the California State Route 14
corridor, about four miles from California City and 15 miles from the town of
Mojave. The Beacon Solar Energy Project would be situated on 2,012-acres of
private land that used to be an agricultural site. The project would produce
electricity using parabolic trough solar thermal technology. Thousands of
parabolic mirrors assembled in rows would receive and concentrate the solar
energy to produce steam for powering a steam turbine generator. If approved by
the Commission the project will begin construction in the third quarter of 2009,
with commercial operations targeted for the third quarter of 2011.
My Comments: They did not say what
utility would get the energy from this plant. The parabolic trough is what I
think will be the most successful. Perhaps we will see some day how much energy
this plant will produce.
Stirling Engines Mirror- Solar Systems
Pictures are
two views of fields of Stirling Engines mounted on a mirror which focuses
the sun's photons onto the the engines mounted on the mirror assembly. The
mirrors will track the suns movement throughout the day.


On
August 11, 2005,
Southern California Edison
announced an agreement to purchase
solar powered Stirling engines from
Stirling Energy Systems[5]
(SES)
over a twenty year period and in quantity (20,000 units) sufficient to generate
500 megawatts of electricity. These systems - to be installed on a 4,500 acre
solar farm - will use mirrors to direct and concentrate sunlight onto the
engines which will in turn drive generators. Each Stirling engine-mirror module
assembly has a power capacity of 25 kWe (33.4 hp)
Stirling Energy Systems
(SES) is a systems
integration and project management company that is developing equipment for
utility-scale renewable energy power plants and distributed electric generating
systems ("gensets"). SES is teamed with Kockums Submarine Systems, NASA-Glenn
Laboratories, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and The Boeing Company for
solar power plants. SES is positioned to become a premier worldwide renewable
energy technology company to meet the global demand for renewable electric
generating technologies through the commercialization of its own Stirling cycle
engine technology for solar and genset applications.
Stirling engines are powered by the expansion of a gas when
heated, followed by the compression of the gas when cooled. The Stirling engine
contains a fixed amount of gas which is transferred back and forth between a
"cold" and a "hot" end. The gasses used inside a Stirling
engine never leave the engine. There are no exhaust valves that vent
high-pressure gasses, as in a gasoline or diesel engine.
The Stirling engine receives the solar
heat focused on the outside of the hot piston wall and it is supplied to the
inside working fluid by conduction. The cold piston gas inside transfers its
heat through the wall to the outside heat sink. In this case the desert air.

The SES Solar Dish Stirling
system is shaped much like large satellite dishes (approximately 37’ in
diameter) and covered with curved mirrors. These solar dishes are programmed to
always face the sun and focus that energy on a collector in much the same way
that a satellite dish focuses radio waves on a tuner. This collector is
connected to a Stirling engine which uses the thermal power generated by the
focused solar energy to heat liquid hydrogen in a closed-loop system. The
expanding hydrogen gas creates a pressure wave on the pistons of the Stirling
engine which spins an electric motor creating electricity with no fuel cost or
pollution. This technology is referred to as solar thermal or concentrating
solar power.
The SES Solar Dish Stirling
system is shaped much like large satellite dishes (approximately 37’ in
diameter) and covered with curved mirrors. These solar dishes are programmed to
always face the sun and focus that energy on a collector in much the same way
that a satellite dish focuses radio waves on a tuner. This collector is
connected to a Stirling engine which uses the thermal power generated by the
focused solar energy to heat liquid hydrogen in a closed-loop system. The
expanding hydrogen gas creates a pressure wave on the pistons of the Stirling
engine which spins an electric motor creating electricity with no fuel cost or
pollution. This technology is referred to as solar thermal or concentrating
solar power.
SES maintains that the dish
Stirling system is technologically ready for use today. They have spent the last
17 years in research and development, and are ready for mass deployment as soon
as sufficient investments and/or execution of power agreements makes mass
production possible.
SES expects that one dish on
an annual basis can produce 60,000 kWh of electricity. Using these data supplied
I calculate a capacity factor of 27% for the system. There is only a
few hours in the winter season to generate energy and not a lot more in the
Spring and Fall seasons. Three months of Summer is the most productive
hours and that is not a lot. No system that only produces a capacity factor of
25% will be a serious contender for energy production.
New announcement. February
2008.
Stirling Energy Systems are planning to build two separate
solar farms, one with the capacity to generate 850 megawatts of electricity in
the Mojave Desert near Victorville, California, for SoCal Edison, and a
900-megawatt plant in the Imperial Valley, near Calexico, California, for SDG&E.
The utilities have signed 20-year deals to buy all the juice the farms can turn
out, and have options to expand the plants if they are successful.
"Without question, this will be the largest solar project
in the world," said Gil Alexander, a spokesman for SoCal Edison. "It will be
bigger than all U.S. solar-energy projects combined.
Bruce Osborn, Stirling Energy
Systems CEO, said his company's dishes are easy to maintain because the engine
is a closed system that never needs to be refilled -- an important factor for a
large-scale facility in the middle of the desert. In fact, the only resource it
consumes is "a little bit of water to wash the mirrors off every few weeks,"
Large Scale Solar Market Gets
$100 Million Boost
18th April 2008
Stirling Energy Systems, Inc. (SES), a Phoenix-based developer of
utility-scale solar powered electricity generation plants has announced an
agreement for NTR plc, a leading international developer and operator in
renewable energy and sustainable waste management, to invest $100 million and
take a controlling interest in the company.
My comments: A little bit of water to wash
the mirrors in the desert? They can wash thousands of these Stirling
Systems every two weeks with a little bit of water? It will take a continuous
stream of water every day to cover these units every two weeks. Also it has
never been clear to me how they cool the units in the desert. . The efficiency
is a function of the temperature difference between the hot cylinder and the
cold one.
Well Sandia National Lab has assembled
six units and tested them. They have set a record for thermal efficiency
of 31.25% compared to the old record of 29.4%. But the units will not be able to
operate at a capacity factor of greater than 25% during the year. They intend to
ultimately build 70,000 of these units for 1,750 MWe capacity.
Let's look at the finance of this project. Perhaps the capitol cost of $150,000 each
will come down under mass production. A
company is going to finance 100 million dollars to the project. Suppose that the
units can be manufactured for one fifth of the $150,000 original cost. That
brings to cost of a MWe system to. (70,000
units times $30,000 = $2,100,000,000.). And they have to buy the land and
install the units yet. The utilities that receive the energy will have to have
reserve system standing by since an intervening cloud cover will require
that the load be picked up or the system could go unstable due to that large of
a rapid energy loss.
The utilities are not taking a financial
liability since they only buy the electric energy generated. Some one must
finance the project. This type of
machines will require maintenance and repair. This could be quite expensive. I
cannot envision 70,000 single Stirling Engines operating mainantance free in the
desert.
Below is a news item in part.
Solar plant could replace plans for cow town
A half-dozen major producers of solar energy are looking
at the 3,000-acre site west of Hinkley as the potential location for as many as
five solar plants, each costing $300 million to build, and producing 100
megawatts of power each, said Henry Orlosky, CEO of Harper Lake LLC.
"With two other 80-megawatt solar plants nearby, this is a
site with a high index of solar radiation," he said. "Various solar companies,
including North Carolina-based Solargenix and Acciona Solar Power of Nevada, are
talking to us about building power plants here. "The
U.S. Department of Energy, working with Edison, pioneered commercial production
of solar power when it built the Solar One plant near Daggett in 1980.
My comment: Here is an example of a
group that plans solar plants with no knowledge of what they are talking about.
Solar One at Daggett, California was a total failure. It sits in the
desert as a pile of worthless junk. And various Solar companies would
consider spending $300 million on such a 100 MWe plant?. Moreover, Solar
One was only a 10 MWe sized plant and they could not even make it work. Would
you like to put your money in the above venture?
Tower Power
Solar II
The Solar One central tower research facility was completed
in 1981 and was operational from 1982 to 1986. Solar two added more mirrors and
was operational from 1995 to 1999.
i am not able to find the data which stated the
electric energy produced over the 1981-1999 time span. I suspect it was
very little.
This is a concentrated solar generating
plant located at Daggett, California. It is a
tower power system of 10 kWe maximum solar power rating. A field of mirrors focuses solar rays on a
tower that houses a flowing heat transfer fluid. The fluid picks up the
heat and transfers it to a steam-electric generating system. I will not
spend a lot time on this facility. It was an abject failure. It was originally
called Solar I. Solar I burned up in a fire on August 31, 1986 when 240,000
gallons of the heat transfer oil caught fire.
They restored it as Solar II using a molten salt heat
transport fluid. This too was a failure. I was a GE unit manager of a plant and
systems design when the Solar II project asked us to bid the engineering
analysis and design of the steam generator-turbine generator systems. We were
experienced in this field since the sodium cooled Fast Breeder Reactor has sodium
heated steam generators similarly to those required by the Solar II steam
generators. We analyzed the system and proposed that they needed a gas fired-
heated feed water heater to keep the salt molten during periods when the sun's
load is low. The sun is low at the start and ends of the day as the sun is
setting. They did not take our advice, nor did they give us the job.
Statement below by the DOE about Solar II.
It is my understanding that system that never really worked
and has been abandoned.

Solar
II successfully demonstrated the power tower concept, including the capability
to store energy economically for dispatch at periods of peak demand.
A few years later I was on my way to Arizona for
a vacation and stopped in to see the Solar II site. The guard would not let me
in, but he said that the molten salt froze and ruined the stream generators and
they hauled them from the site a short time ago. The was about 15 years ago, The unit never produced a
significant amount of energy. It stands abandoned in the desert, a quarter of a
billion dollar pile of junk. However, the National Renewable Energy
Laboratory reports that Solar II demonstrated continuous operation for nearly a
week, frequently at part load.
Now parts of Solar II
are used as a gamma ray observatory, so the
project will continue to provide useful data to the scientific community, but it
does not supply any electric energy.
My comment: They consider nearly a week of operation a successful operating
time?
This looks like a gross loser to me, but
hope springs eternally. This is suppose to be a new technology? I guess they are
not aware of the Tower power II failure described above. I cannot imagine who
would finance such a project. It snows in Colorado, panels covered with snow
would not reflect solar energy.
SkyFuel to use 'power tower,' salt to gather sun's
energy
Dec 7 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - The Pueblo
Chieftain, Colo. Should SkyFuel decide to locate a 1,000-megawatt
solar power plant near Del Norte, the company hopes to use a new
technology that would make solar power cheaper and easier to get to market.
The Department of Energy awarded the company a $435,000 grant at the end of
last month to continue research on its Linear Power Tower. The system uses a
Fresnel-lens style array of mirrors, the same style of lens commonly used in
flattened magnifying glasses, stop lights and lighthouses, said William
Felsher, vice president of project sales for the company. The style would
allow the company to lay its panels out flat close to the ground in a
North-South configuration, and tilt them side to side to catch the sun's daily
journey from East to West across the sky. The system is cheaper and easier to
maintain than systems using smaller, pole-mounted mirrors, which each must
have their own motors and mounting gear. The long thin panels reflect the
sun's light toward a single horizontal "tower" to gather the heat. The company
believes that the power towers, along with the high temperature and storage
capabilities of molten salt, will make its power less expensive and easier to
distribute to market.
Update about SkyFuel
NYC-based SkyFuel uses two concentrating solar power
technologies - Parabolic Trough and Linear Fresnel - that the sun's normal
radiation onto heat-absorbing pipes. This creates steam that can be used for
electric power generation or industrial processes.
Today PEWire reports that SkyFuel has raised $1.6M in a
first round from angel investors. It has already largely built out its
management team and says it expects to open a manufacturing facility in New
Mexico. The investment was organized by the boutique bank GC Andersen.
Well Governor Bill Richardson should
be happy about this announcement, but 1.6 million dollars is hardly seed money
for such a project. I wonder who will pay the cost of building such a
project.
Below is an
announcement in part:
Merger Lifts Solar Towers Prospects in US
MELBOURNE, Mar 19, 2007 /PRNewswire-FirstCall
Moves to merge Solar Tower power station development
interests into a wholly owned subsidiary of EnviroMission Limited (ASX: EVM)(US
OTC: EVOMY) is set to lift US Solar Tower development prospects via a
multi-national business development model proposed under the terms of the
merger.
Shareholder approval will be sought to merge US based SolarMission
Technologies, Inc. (SolarMission) with Melbourne based EnviroMission Limited (EnviroMission)
into a newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary of EnviroMission, to create a
single development vehicle with exclusive multi-national rights to develop Solar
Tower renewable energy power stations in global markets including Australia and
the US.
My comment: I wonder if they are aware of
the US experience with Solar Tower Power systems? I do not think this project
will ever get started.
Xcel Energy seeks more solar projects
Dec 8 - McClatchy-Tribune Business News Formerly
Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News - Karen Vigil The Pueblo Chieftain, Colo.
Xcel Energy announced this week that it is
requesting proposals for commercial, customer-sited solar installations as
part of its compliance with the Colorado Renewable Portfolio Standard.
The company is looking to produce 7,000 megawatt-hours per year in
new solar projects. Each proposal must be rated above 100 kilowatts and less
than 2 megawatts in capacity in the company's Colorado service territory.
Proposals are due and should include the price per solar-on-site renewable
energy credit and the number of credits per year. The company is issuing a
second request for proposals as required by the Colorado Public Utilities
Commission.
"This RFP demonstrates Xcel Energy's commitment to
meeting Colorado's renewable energy standard," said Fred Stoffel,
vice-president of marketing. "It also allows customers to take advantage of
the federal tax incentives allowed by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which
will expire at the end of 2007."
Bidders can find more information at
www.xcelenergy.com/solar .
My comment: To get 7,000
megawatt-hours per year they will have to bid at least two 2 MWe solar plants at
a total capital cost of about 35 million Dollars.
Here is is a parabolic mirror solar
system, the first in many years.
Acciona Connects
to the Nevada Grid the World's Largest Solar Thermal Plant in 16 Years
BOULDER
CITY, Nevada, Jun 07, 2007 -- BUSINESS WIRE
Acciona Solar
Power, a world leader in the design, development and ownership of solar thermal
technologies, has announced that its Nevada Solar One project, the
largest-capacity solar power plant built in the world in 16 years and the
third-largest of its kind, has begun supplying power to the Nevada Power grid.
The plant represents an investment of more than $250 million.
Acciona Solar Power, a majority-owned subsidiary of Acciona Energy, a
world leader in renewable energies, built Nevada Solar One over the course of 16
months. The 64-MW solar thermal power plant covers 400 acres in the Eldorado
Valley and utilizes large-scale, parabolic trough technology to enable heat
transfer from the sun's rays to ultimately generate up to 134 million kW hours
of electricity per year, enough to power 15,000 households annually.
All of the
plant's electricity production is being sold to Nevada Power Company and Sierra
Pacific Power Company under long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs). The PPAs
will ensure fixed costs for the electricity, making solar power an economically
feasible energy alternative over time.
My Comments: This plant is only 64 MWe with a
capacity factor of 23.9%. Its capital cost is $4,000 per KWe installed and
the energy from it would be 20 cents per KWh before taxes if it were not paid
for by the government. Its capitol cost per kWe is double that of a nuclear
plant and its energy output is only 6.4% of a normal nuclear sized power plant.
Its cost of energy is 20 times that of a nuclear plant.
(There will never be enough time for this
cost to be economical. But it is not $10,000 per kWe installed like photovoltaic
cells are.)
It is clear that this concept is not an
answer to our energy supply and I doubt that many more will be built.
First Solar to Supply Modules for 40 MW Solar Plant
First Solar, Inc. (Nasdaq:FSLR) announced today that it
will supply solar modules for a 40-megawatt solar power plant that will be
constructed in the Saxon region of Germany in the municipality of Brandis by
juwi solar GmbH. Upon completion, the project will be one of the largest
photovoltaic projects ever constructed. Project construction is scheduled to
begin in the second quarter of 2007 and is expected to be completed within 30
months.
The project represents an investment of 130 million EURO and will be financed by
Saxon LB. Upon completion, the project will utilize approximately 550,000 solar
modules and produce around 40 million kilowatt hours of clean power annually,
preventing an estimated 25,000 metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions from
being released into the environment.
My comment: The Germans are going
solar. If I calculated this right the cost this project in US dollars is 168
million dollars, The capacity factor of this installation is only 11 %.Not much
sun in Germany and much snow falls in the winter. Cost per installed kWe is
$4,225. This calculates to about 26 cents per kWh. Germany is said to be going
renewables, and it will cost them dearly to do so.