|
Home
Page
Nuclear Plants
Fast
Breeders
Reprocessing is the Answer
Spent
Nuclear Fuel
Solar
Wind
Fossil Fuels
Biomass
Oil
Coal
Natural Gas
Hydrogen
The Ethanol Debate
Desert Solar Plants
Environmentalis
Religions
Global Warming
California's Folly
About Me
| |
|
In this page I decided to address the large Desert Solar
Electric Generation Plants in California. The US now intends to fill
the Deserts with Solar Electric Generation Plants. These plants have
relatively large capacity ratings and will be placed at various locations in
the California desert. I suspect that some will not get funded.
Albert Gore says we have enough solar,
wind, and geothermal energy systems to supply the nations need of
energy. So the solar plants offered below are a start. But a start to what? I
submit, it will be a start of the proof that solar plants will not do
the job. And it will take another ten years to prove it. The low
capacity factor of these plants and the failure of many will prove it. So
let's get started.
Concerns over
environmental impact of solar power in California
A 4,000-acre solar power project in San Bernardino
County, California, is facing opposition from county officials and
environmental groups, the San Bernardino Sun reports.
The Ivanpah Valley solar development would produce up to 440 megawatts of
electricity through solar thermal technology, where mirrors reflect sunlight
on a liquid-filled tower to make steam. The project would offset 450,000 tons
of carbon emissions per year, says developer BrightSource Energy, but not
everyone is thrilled about its environmental benefits.
County Supervisor Brad Mitzelfelt is trying to derail Ivanpah Valley because
it is sited in desert tortoise territory in the Mojave Desert. Endangered
plant species would be threatened, too.
BrightSource spokesman Keely Wachs suggests that the development "will
generate 1,000 jobs, $250 million in wages and more that $400 million in local
and state tax revenue." But Mitzelfelt counters that most of those jobs would
go to the Las Vegas area and most of the electricity would be sent to San
Francisco.
"There are better places to put solar energy," says Eldon Hughes of the San
Gorgonio chapter of the Sierra Club.
My comment: But not in my back
yard
Water in the Desert is a scarce
commodity.
NextEra wants
to tap freshwater wells to supply the 521 million gallons of cooling water
the plant, the Beacon Solar Energy Project, would consume in a year, despite a
state policy against the use of drinking-quality water for power plant
cooling.
Mike Edminston,
a city council member from nearby California City, warned at a hearing that
groundwater recharge was already “not keeping up with the utilization we
have.”
Well the solar plants need water to
clean the solar concentrating panels and to condense the steam. Looks
like a show stopper for these units. Filling the desert with solar electric
generating systems has serious difficulties.
The huge nuclear generating plants in
the Arizona Deserts use dry cooling towers to condense the steam and do not
need water to keep solar concentrating panels clean.
Feinstein Seeks to Block Solar Power
From Desert Land
Sen. Feinstein Seeks Monument Status To
Keep Solar, Wind Projects Off 500,000 Mojave Acres
Nineteen companies have
submitted applications to build solar or wind facilities on a parcel of
500,000 desert acres, but Sen. Dianne Feinstein said Friday such development
would violate the spirit of what conservationists had intended when they
donated much of the land to the public.
Feinstein said she intends to push legislation that would turn the land
into a national monument, which would allow for existing uses to continue
while preventing future development.
Battle Brewing
Over Giant Desert Solar Farm
By
Todd Woody
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Environmental groups are worried that a massive solar
project in the Mojave will threaten protected wildlife, like this fringe-toed
lizard.
Tessera Solar
plans to plant 34,000 solar dishes — each one 40 feet high and 38 feet wide —
on 8,230 acres of the Mojave Desert in Southern California.
Although the
lengthy licensing process for the Calico solar farm remains in the early
stages, several environmental groups are already raising red flags about the
massive project’s impact on such protected wildlife as the desert tortoise,
the Mojave fringe-toed lizard and Nelson’s bighorn sheep.
Calico is one of
dozens of industrial-scale solar farms planned for the Southwest that have
divided environmentalists over the need to promote renewable energy while
protecting fragile desert ecosystems.
But the sheer
size of the Calico project, as well as its location next to federal
conservation areas, is drawing scrutiny from grassroots green activists and
national organizations like the
Defenders of Wildlife.
The solar farm
would generate 850 megawatts of electricity for Southern California Edison.
Also jumping
into the fray is a well-funded labor group that is pressing solar developers
to employ union workers, and the Wildlands Conservancy, a Southern California
non-profit that supports a proposal by Senator
Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California, to ban renewable energy
development on hundreds of thousands of acres of the Mojave adjacent to
Calico.
.“Our feeling is
the utility-scale project should first be sited on disturbed land, public or
private, instead of pristine lands,” April Sall, the conservation director for
the
Wildlands Conservancy, told California Energy Commission staff at a recent
hearing on the Calico project. “There are several endangered species, plant
and animal, that would be affected by this project,” Ms. Sall said, adding
that the “the side-blotched lizard” might also affected.
The labor group,
called
California Unions for Reliable Energy, sent an attorney and biologist to
testify at the hearing. The group has
come under fire for inundating developers who decline to sign labor
agreements with demands that they conduct scores of costly environmental
studies on their solar projects.
California
Unions for Reliable Energy has taken a particularly aggressive stance in the
Calico case, dispatching its own biologist to investigate the project site. At
the hearing, the biologist, Scott Cashen, accused Tessera Solar of providing
scientifically invalid data in its license application as well as
underestimating the solar farm’s consequences for wildlife.
“Our concerns
basically revolve around the lack of any sort of scientific rigor that was
devoted to establishing base line conditions at the site,” Mr. Cashen said.
Sean Gallagher,
Tessera Solar’s vice president for market strategy and regulatory affairs,
said in an interview on Tuesday that the company has followed regulators’
scientific protocols in preparing its license application.
Mr. Gallagher
said he has been in discussions with the
Natural Resources Defense Council, the
Sierra Club and other environmental groups and expects Tessera Solar will
be able to address their wildlife concerns.
“I’m not
surprised there’s a lot of interest from environmentalists given the size of
the project, but I don’t expect this to turn into a big fight,” Mr. Gallagher
said.
Tessera Solar,
which is based in Houston, stresses that its SunCatcher solar dish is more
environmentally friendly than other solar thermal technologies, consuming less
water and requiring no grading of the desert.
And while the
company acknowledged in its license application that the project would have
“significant” impact on the desert tortoise and other plant and animal
species, it also concluded that measures taken to minimize its environmental
impact means that Calico “would not substantially affect, reduce the number
of, or restrict the range of unique, rare, or endangered species of animal or
plant, or the habitat of these species.”
Comments
from those who live in the deserts. Water is a short commodity
We have a challenge in
finding water even though we’re low water use,” said Sean Gallagher, a Tessera
executive. “It forces you to do some creative deals.”
In the Amargosa
Valley, Solar Millennium may have to negotiate access to water with scores of
individuals and companies who own the right to stick a straw in the aquifer,
so to speak, and withdraw a prescribed amount of water each year.
“There
are a lot of people out here for whom their water rights are their life
savings, their retirement,” said Ed Goedhart, a local farmer and state
legislator, as he drove past pockets of sun-beaten mobile homes and
luminescent patches of irrigated alfalfa. Farmers will be growing less of the
crop, he said, if they decide to sell their water rights to Solar Millennium.
“We’ll be growing megawatts instead of alfalfa,” Mr.
Goedhart said.
While water is particularly scarce in the West, it is becoming a problem all
over the country as the population grows. Daniel M. Kammen, director of the
Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory at the
University of California, Berkeley,
predicted that as intensive renewable energy development spreads, water issues
will follow.
“When we start getting 20 percent, 30 percent or 40 percent of our power from
renewables,” Mr. Kammen said, “water will be a key issue.”
BrightSource has pulled put of the race. It is too much trouble to get
land in California for such projects. Dianne Feinstein is winning this race to
save the desert. Others will probably withdraw also. At the present time only
one desert plant is being built and it is a very small system of only 177 MWe
capacity.
- Solar thermal company BrightSource Inc
has dropped plans to build a solar power plant in the Mojave Desert, losing a
battle with environmentalists and a U.S. senator who want to preserve the
surrounding area.
Privately held BrightSource had applied
with the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to build a 500-megawatt solar thermal
power plant at the Broadwell Dry Lake area in California.
This is what Repower America has to say
about solar plants.
Solar Thermal Power: Concentrated solar
thermal power systems, also known as solar thermal power, covering a parcel of
land fewer than 100 miles on a side in the Southwest could theoretically
supply 100% of America’s electricity needs. A proven technology just beginning
to scale up in the US, solar thermal power already produces enough electricity
for about 100,000 homes and large-scale projects by eight different companies
are underway with major utilities to power 10 times that many homes in the
next three years. Industry engineers project that plants put into operation
after 2013 – and perhaps sooner – will come equipped with 6-8 hours of
energy storage, allowing them to continue to provide power after the sun goes
down.
My comment: I can find only 177 MWe of
solar plant capacity now under construction. Also major utilities are
not putting a dime into solar plants. Independent financial
organizations are trying to get financing for solar plants, but are not too
successful yet. The money may never come unless President Obama gets the
Government to supply it.
The area of the solar concentrating
panels currently configured for the desert electric energy systems are all
deficient. in the collector capacity. The solar panels only
provide enough panel surface area to allow the electric energy systems to
operate only while the sun shines during the day. They all have capacity
factors of about 20%. This is a gross mistake. It is often said
that enough sun falls on the earth's surface to supply all of our country's
energy needs. Why do we configure solar panels surface area to supply
only enough sun's heat to operate the electric energy systems at capacity
factors of only 20%. It would be a very easy to provide enough
solar panels to heat a fluid and store it to provide enough steam to
allow the power- electric plants to operate on a 24/7 basis. The
current solar panels surface area will never supply sufficient
electric energy to meet the State's goal of supplying 33%
renewable electric energy
Here is a classic example of what I am
and talking about. They think that this huge solar power plant is going to
operate at a capacity factor of 30%. (I think the actual capacity factor will
be closer to 20?) But at any rate there is not enough solar
collector surface to make this plant worth while. They should construct enough
solar collectors to operate on a 24/7 basis. They would then get about
11 billion kilowatt hours per year. I do not think this plant will produce an
economical amount of electric energy per year.
Southern California Edison and BrightSource
Energy Sign World's Largest Solar Deal Agreement for 1,300 Megawatts of Clean
and Reliable Solar Thermal Power
ROSEMEAD, Calif., Feb 11, 2009 -- BUSINESS
WIRE
Southern California Edison (SCE) and
BrightSource Energy have reached agreement on a series of contracts for 1,300
megawatts of clean solar thermal power. The full 1,300 megawatts of projects
will produce 3.7 billion kilowatt-hours of clean energy per year.
Below is the table of the current status of the proposed
solar projects in California deserts.
Solar Projects Currently Under Review by Energy
Commission and BLM Arranged by Date Application For
Certification Was Filed
Project Name
and Applicant |
Location |
Size & Technology
(megawatts) |
Lead Agency |
Status* |
Victorville 2 Hybrid Power Project
City of Victorville |
Victorville |
563 MW
513 MW natural gas
50 MW solar trough |
Energy Commission |
APPROVED
AFC filed 2/28/07
Approved 7/16/08 |
|
Projects Approved - MW |
50 MW |
|
|
Ivanpah Solar
Solar Partners/Brightsource |
San Bernardino County |
400 MW
solar tower |
Energy Commission |
Under Review
AFC filed 8/31/07 |
Carrizo Energy Solar Farm
Carrizo Energy LLC |
San Luis Obispo County |
177 MW
Compact Linear Fresnel Reflector |
Energy Commission |
Under Review
AFC filed 10/25/07 |
Beacon Solar Energy Project
Beacon Solar LLC |
Kern County |
250 MW
solar trough |
Energy Commission |
Under Review
AFC filed 3/14/08 |
Solar Two Project
Tessera Solar (formerly Stirling Energy Systems) |
Imperial County |
750 MW
Stirling engine |
Energy Commission |
Under Review
AFC filed 6/30/08 |
City of Palmdale Hybrid Gas-Solar
City of Palmdale |
Palmdale |
617 MW
555 MW natural gas
62 MW solar trough |
Energy Commission |
Under Review
AFC Filed 8/4/08 |
San Joaquin Solar 1 & 2
San Joaquin Solar LLC |
Fresno County |
106.8 MW
solar trough / biomass hybrid |
Energy Commission |
Under Review
AFC Filed 11/26/2008 |
Solar One Project
Tessera Solar (formerly Stirling Energy Systems) |
San Bernardino County |
850 MW
Stirling engine |
Energy Commission |
Under Review
AFC Filed 12/2/2008 |
Abengoa Mojave Solar Project
Abengoa Solar Inc. |
San Bernardino County |
250 MW
solar trough |
Energy Commission |
Pre-Review
AFC Filed 8/10/2009 |
Solar Millennium Palen
Solar Millennium LLC |
Riverside County |
484 MW
solar trough |
Energy Commission |
Pre-Review
AFC Filed 8/24/2009 |
Solar Millennium Blythe
Solar Millennium LLC |
Riverside County |
1,000 MW
solar trough |
Energy Commission |
Pre-Review
AFC Filed 8/24/2009 |
Genesis Solar
Genesis Solar LLC / NextEra™ Energy Resources LLC |
Riverside County |
250 MW
solar trough |
Energy Commission |
Pre-Review
AFC Filed 8/31/2009 |
Solar Millennium Ridgecrest
Solar Millennium |
Kern County |
250 MW
solar trough |
Energy Commission |
Pre-Review
AFC Filed 9/1/2009 |
Rice Solar Energy Project
Rice Solar LLC / SolarReserve LLC |
Riverside County |
150 MW
central tower |
Energy Commission |
Pre-Review
AFC Filed 10/21/2009 |
|
Projects Under Review - MW |
4,979.8 MW |
|
|
* AFC = Application For Certification is the license application filed
with California Energy Commission for thermal power plants 50
megawatts or larger.
|
|
|
Excerpts from a newspaper article
Most of the proposed utility-scale solar plants are slated
for San Bernardino and Riverside counties, where vast deserts offer abundant
xsunshine and plenty of open space for the behemoths. The U.S. Bureau of Land
Management is juggling so many requests from companies looking to build on
federal land -- 79 at last count, covering more than 690,000 acres -- that it
had to stop accepting applications for a few weeks last summer. Many of these
facilities may never get built. Environmentalists are mobilizing. U.S. credit
markets are in a deep freeze.
What! Environmentalists are against
solar plants? And the capital cost? I have no idea who would pony up the money
to pay for these turkeys..
Solar Stirling System under way.
While the CEC still needs to approve these projects,
Stirling is at least a few steps closer to starting construction of the
solar plants. If Solar One is approved, construction is supposed to
start in late 2010 and take 40 months to complete, while construction of
Solar Two could start in late 2009 or early 2010 and could also take
around 40 months to complete. Solar One would be built on 8,230 acres of
land in San Bernardino County, Calif., use 30,000, 25-kilowatt solar
dishes, and will sell power to California utility Southern California
Edison. Solar Two will use 6,500 acres of land in Imperial County,
Calif., 30,000 25-kilowatt solar dishes and sell power to San Diego Gas
& Electric. ( They do not sell power, they
sell energy if there is any. And the utilities do not put in a dime for
the capital cost. )
In April
Phoenix-based Stirling
raised $100 million from Dublin, Ireland’s NTR, and in the process
NTR took a 52-percent stake in the company,
according to the Cleantech Group. Stirling’s technology, unlike most
of the utility-scale solar providers, uses a combination of solar
thermal concentration devices and engines to produce clean power.
My Comments: This total
system involves 60,000 individual solar Sterling engines and a land
mass of 14,730 acres. About 3 billion dollars should be enough to buy
the engines. The land cost is another item. I cannot guess who would
pony up that much money, but we will see.
Arizona has selected the parabolic reflectors
with an intermediate heat transfer fluid, similar to the existing system at
Kramer's Junction. This is the only solar-electric generating
system that has been successfully in California. I believe that those
building solar plants in the California desert will be sorry they too did
not select the parabolic reflector system with an intermediate heat
transfer fluid.
.
APS Announces New Solar Power Plant, Among World’s
Largest
Power Station Will Provide Renewable Electricity to About
70,000 APS Customers
PHOENIX--(BUSINESS
WIRE)--Arizona Public Service Co. (APS) today announced plans for one of the
world’s largest solar facilities –
a 280-megawatt (MW) concentrating solar power (CSP) plant to be built 70 miles
southwest of Phoenix, near Gila Bend, Arizona.
Brandt said APS chose Abengoa Solar because of its
extensive experience
Parabolic mirrors track the sun and focus solar energy on a
heat transfer fluid. Once heated, the liquid converts water into steam, which
turns the plant’s turbines to create electricity.
This technology allows the plant to produce more energy for customers than a
traditional solar power plant which only produces electricity when exposed to
direct sunlight.
The California
Environmental Quality Act requires special emphasis should be placed on
environmental resources. I wonder how this racks up with the need for
copious amounts of water to keep the panels clear?
( c) Knowledge of the
regional setting is critical to the assessment of environmental impacts.
Special emphasis should be placed on environmental resources that are rare
or unique to that region and would be affected by the project. The EIR must
demonstrate that the significant environmental impacts of the proposed
project were adequately investigated and discussed and it must permit the
significant effects of the project to be considered in the full
environmental context
Apparently Solel has bought the
parabolic Mirror system at
Kramer's junction and intends
to build a giant new solar plant in the Mojave Desert.
Solel Inc. is developing the 553 MW Mojave Solar
Park 1 (MSP-1), the world's largest solar thermal power plant, in California's
Mojave Desert. In July 2007, Solel Inc. concluded a 25 year Power Purchase
Agreement with Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) to provide it with electricity
from MSP-1. Solel will build MSP-1 using Solel 6, Solel's industry leading
solar thermal collector. MSP-1 will encompass nine square miles and
will provide PG&E with 1,388 gigawatts of energy annually at a price competitive
with plants powered by fossil fuels.
Of all of the desert solar
system, I think this one has the best chance of succeeding. The reason for this
is due to the fact that the solar panels heat a heat transfer fluid in
tubes running through the parabolic reflectors. The fluid is then stored in a
large tank and is pumped to a shell and tube stream generator that heats water
to steam for the turbine. This intermediate heat transfer fluid allows the
system to carry out a more controlled heat balance of the power plant system.
In a feasibility study performed by the Electric
Power Research Institute (EPRI) found that the most feasible solar
technology system currently available for a large scale plant is the parabolic
trough.
My comment: I agree with the
above statement. I think the reason for this is due to the use of an
intermediate heat transfer fluid. The parabolic trough heats this
fluid which then goes into a holding tank. The thermal properties of the
fluid in the holding tank are well known. This fluid is then pumped into the
shell side of the steam generator to heat the feedwater coming for the Rankine
cycle of the power plant. This makes it possible to have well known
hot fluid thermal conditions at the inlet to the steam generator. This
provides good control heat balance over the process of generating the
steam conditions going to the turbine. Generating steam is not a simple
process. It requires well known conditions of the heating process and feed water
inlet parameters.
The above reasons are why I
think the Tower Power and Fresnel Panel systems will not be as successful as the
parabolic trough systems.
Moreover, the Parabolic Trough
system is the only a proven system in California over the last thirty
years. The Tower Power system at Daggett California was a dismal failure and it
was abandoned.
At Kramer Junction, California, there is a solar
installation called SEGS (Solar Electric Generating System, built by LUZ
International), of which there are nine units. SEGS uses an array of parabolic
mirrors (see picture), laid out on north-south axes to concentrate reflected
sunlight onto a black tube through which therminol flows.
The solar-trough array at Kramer Junction, California.
The
shiny surfaces focus sunlight
onto the black tubes that run along the
array. The therminol fluid,
thus heated, is pumped to a heat exchanger where it is used to boil water for a
(Rankine) steam cycle system. As the sun
moves from east to west, the
reflectors rotate so as to keep facing the
sun.
To operate at peak
efficiency the mirrors are pressure washed every ten to twenty days. If you want
a full explanation and analysis of the SEGS system go to the NREL.com site. But
be careful they are, in my opinion too optimist about the future of this
concept. Also they are not too free on relating the capacity factors of the
system. Low capacity factors are the bane of renewable energy systems. The
capacity factor of the SEGS plant when operating on solar energy alone is only
25 percent.
It appears that the parabolic trough
system has been adopted as the favorite for concentrating solar plants. Below is
a recent announcement for such a plant being built in Nevada
Assembly of the
parabolic-trough system components is underway for a 64-Megawatt Nevada plant,
which will generate enough electricity to power about 11,000 homes.
Here is what what the Department of Energy Thinks about the trough system.
Trough systems
are commercially available and in use today. However, because of the very low
cost of today's fossil fuels, they cannot yet compete on a cost-of-electricity
basis with fossil-based systems,. A favorable financing arrangement—one likely
to be stimulated by green power markets—could enable parabolic troughs to begin
to play a role in the marketplace, however. And as global demand for clean
energy sources rises, trough systems will become more financially attractive.
The Linear Fresnel
Reflector solar System
The Carrizo Energy
Company intends to construct a 177 MWe Linear Fresnel Reflector System in
San Luis Obispo County, California. PG&E has contracted to take the energy
from this system.
It
should be noted that PG&E is not putting any money in this venture. They are
only taking the electric energy if any is ever produced. This is necessary due
to the CPUC forcing PG&E to go green.
The Project
design will incorporate Ausra's
proprietary CLFR technology to
concentrate solar energy on tubes in an
elevated receiver. The concentrated
solar energy boils water within a row of specially coated stainless steel tubes in an
insulated cavity to produce saturated
steam. The steam produced in the
receivers is collected in a series of pipes,
routed to steam drums, and then to the two
turbine generators. Steam used by the steam
turbines is condensed back to water and
returned to the solar field.
The advantage of this design is that lenses are cheaper than mirrors.
Furthermore, if a material is chosen that has some flexibility, then a less
rigid frame is required to withstand wind load
Prototypes of Fresnel lenses concentrators have been produced
for the collection of thermal energy by
International Automated Systems. No
full-scale thermal systems using Fresnel lenses are known to be in operation.
Ausra, which manufactures equipment for
solar-thermal power plants, has secured $30 million in venture debt
and is negotiating for an "add-on" round of $15 million from original
investors Khosla Ventures and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, according
to a company executive.
My comments: It is commendable that two
organizations would pony up $45 million dollars for this project. Lets follow it
to see how they come out. they must need another $300,000,000 to complete th
177,000 kWe solar system.
It seems to me that the panels on the
desert floor are so close together that power washing them will be very
difficult. Also stainless steel tubes are selected as the tube material to
receive the sun's energy and heat the steam-water in the over head
Fresnel tubes arranged horizontally. In the US we do not use stainless
steel to receive heat and transport steam- water mixtures because
stainless steel cannot withstand impurities such as caustics in the water-steam
systems.
I think they should have arranged the tubes
in a vertical direction with the down comer tubes in the center and
the heated tubes around the out side and also he seam drums at the top.
This would provide a natural circulation steam-water system and it does
not require multiple steam drums in series. And they could control the water
level tin the steam drums.
I cannot envision what kind of heat
transfer-heat balance they will get with the steam water mixture flowing
horizontally in the tubes. Boiling water is not a simple matter. I wonder
what kind of steam quality mixture they will get at the end of the Fresnel
tubes? But the saturated steam going the turbine is a good idea and the only way
this system has a chance of working. And at the beginning and and end of
the daily cycle they may not get any steam at all.
Well I have given them a lot of free advice.
They will not listen to it anyway. The folks at Daggett did not listen
either and it was a total failure. Where is the NREL when we need them? They
should weigh in on these matters also. PG&E does not care. They do
not have to pay dime for the system. They pay only for the energy if they
ever get any.
Financial Backer of this project.
Khosla is an Indian-American venture
capitalist. He is an influential personality in Silicon Valley. He was one of
the co-founders of Sun Microsystems and became a general partner of the venture
capital firm Kleiner, Perkins, Caufield & Byers in 1986. Knosla may be a lot
poorer when this is over.
The company is in
discussions for another 1,000
megawatts of production and has another 6,000 megawatts "in the pipeline,"
Davis said. He said electricity from its system is 30 percent to 40 percent
cheaper than solar-photovoltaic plants and equivalent in price to natural-gas
power plants with the 30 percent tax credit that renewable-energy projects get.
(And these solar plants with their 20% capacity
factors will offer electric energy for the same price as nuclear plants?)
Here is a blurb abut the Fresnel solar
system. No experience yet, but system is being tried in Spain.
To date there has
been no experience of using Fresnel collectors under actual operating
conditions. In order to ensure and prove that this technology is ready for use
in later commercial plants, we decided to build a complete demonstration plant -
the same size as a collector module, which would be used in a solar power
station. In this way the Fresnel design concept can be validated in an
experiment. Reliable figures and data are essential to examine the very
promising future of the technology and therefore confidence with customers and
investors in the new technology. The technology should be ready for market by
2008 in large-scale
Tokyo Electric to build solar plant in California:
report
TOKYO (AFP) –- Tokyo Electric
Power Co. will build a solar power plant in the U.S. state of California
through its subsidiary Eurus Energy Holdings Corp., according to a report.
It plans to begin operations at the
1000 kilowatt plant by 2010 on a site yet to be selected, the Nikkei
business daily reported.
Eurus, already engaged in wind power
generation in the United States, wants to take advantage of incentives
expected to be provided by the new U.S. government to boost solar power
generation nationwide, Nikkei said.
Tokyo Electric is one of four Japanese
corporate giants moving into the U.S. renewable energy market with solar
and wind power technologies, the daily said.
In
anticipation of growing U.S. demand, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. will
raise its domestic production capacity for wind turbines by about 30
percent to 1.6 million kilowatts possibly by March 2010, Nikkei said.
The
787-billion-dollar U.S. economic stimulus package, which was passed on
Tuesday, earmarks 38 billion dollars for investments in the environmental
energy sectors.
Is
Obama dumb enough to bank roll these desert solar turkeys?
|
|
Tokyo Electric to build solar plant in California:
report
TOKYO (AFP) –- Tokyo Electric
Power Co. will build a solar power plant in the U.S. state of California
through its subsidiary Eurus Energy Holdings Corp., according to a report.
It plans to begin operations at the
1000 kilowatt plant by 2010 on a site yet to be selected, the Nikkei
business daily reported.
Eurus, already engaged in wind power
generation in the United States, wants to take advantage of incentives
expected to be provided by the new U.S. government to boost solar power
generation nationwide, Nikkei said.
Tokyo Electric is one of four Japanese
corporate giants moving into the U.S. renewable energy market with solar
and wind power technologies, the daily said.
In
anticipation of growing U.S. demand, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. will
raise its domestic production capacity for wind turbines by about 30
percent to 1.6 million kilowatts possibly by March 2010,
Nikkei said.
The
787-billion-dollar U.S. economic stimulus package, which was passed on
Tuesday, earmarks 38 billion dollars for investments in the environmental
energy sectors.
Is
Obama dumb enough to bank roll these desert solar turkeys?
I hope the US does not bank roll the
Japanese companies either
Here is a request for information about the
CARRIZO SOLAR FARM. It concerns only the environmental information. Whether or
not the system will produce energy is not a concern of the CEC. In my opinion it
will produce very little electric energy. Don Lutz
SUBJECT: DATA
REQUEST SET 4 - NUMBERS 113 THROUGH 134
CARRIZO ENERGY
SOLAR FARM APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION (07-AFC-8)
Dear Mr. Fontana,
Pursuant to Title 20, California Code of Regulations,
section 1716, the California Energy Commission staff is asking for the
information specified in the enclosed data requests related to the Carrizo
Energy Solar Farm (CESF) Application for Certification (AFC)
(07AFC-8). The information requested is necessary to: 1) more fully
understand the project, 2) assess whether the facility will be constructed
and operated in compliance with applicable regulations, 3) assess whether
the project will result in significant environmental impacts, 4) assess
whether the facilities will be constructed and operated in a safe,
efficient and reliable manner, and 5) assess potential mitigation
measures.
This fourth set of data requests (#s 113-134) is being
made in the area(s) of biological resources, cultural resources, soil and
water resources, traffic and transportation, and waste management. Written
responses to the enclosed data requests are due to the Energy Commission
staff on or before September 29,2008.
PG&E makes huge solar deal
UTILITY PROJECT WOULD PUT FIVE POWER PLANTS IN MOJAVE
DESERT
Article Launched: 04/01/2008 01:34:35 AM PDT
Pacific Gas & Electric today will announce the
largest series of solar-power contracts in the utility's history. The deal, to
buy as much as 900 megawatts of electricity - or enough to power
540,000 California homes each year - involves five plants to be built during
the next decade.
If the solar-thermal power plants designed by
Oakland's BrightSource Energy become operational, a significant amount of
power for PG&E customers could come from the sun that beats down on the Mojave
Desert.
"From what I know, this is the biggest
commitment ever in the history of solar," said John Woolard, BrightSource
Energy's chief executive officer and president. "It's a fairly significant
undertaking on both sides."
Building all five plants in the Mojave will
cost $2 billion to $3 billion, Woolard said. The project, which faces
regulatory and financing hurdles, could mean 2,000 construction jobs, and
employ about 1,000 workers to operate the plants. PG&E didn't disclose
the financial details of the contracts
My comments: Matt Nauman is a fine
fellow, but as is true of most newspaper reporters, he knows nothing about
energy. In the first place PG&E did not buy 900 megawatt of electricity because
this is only the power rating of the 900 MWe facility, it is not
electrical energy. PG&E bought nothing, and has taken no financial liability.
PG&E will pay for the energy kWh produced by the BrightSource company's solar
power plant, if there ever is any. And the rate PG&W will pay has not been
determined.
PG&E must commit to buying energy
from solar plants as required by the State of California. If the rate is too
high the State must reimburse PG&E for part of the cost of energy. This means
you the tax payer will chip in.
As for a 900 MWe power plant, it
probably will never get built because it requires many financial backers for
such a project. Are there that many suckers out there? I think not.
Moreover, 900 MWe plant capacity
will only provide enough electric energy for 160,000 homes, not 540,000. And
they will have to power wash the panels every 10 days or so.
It appears that these these
plants will be the Tower power configuration. Perhaps the Brightsource Energy
Co. should visit the Tower Power Plant at Daggett, CA. They did not work
at all.
Review Process Begins for Solar Thermal Project in Kern
County
Sacramento - 5/22/08
The California Energy Commission today accepted an application to
build a 250-megawatt solar thermal generating complex in Kern County.
By a vote of 5-0, the Commission said it has enough information to
begin the review of the Beacon Solar Energy Project proposed by a wholly owned
subsidiary of Florida Power and Light Company. After finding the application for
certification (AFC) from Delaware-based Beacon Solar LLC "data adequate," the
Commission assigned a committee of two to lead the 12-month review of the
proposed plant. Commission staff will now begin the data discovery and analysis
phase of the licensing process. Commissioner Karen Douglas will head the
committee that will ensure that the project meets the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act. Commissioner Jeff Byron will serve as the
Associate Member.
Beacon Solar LLC plans to develop the project on
the western edge of the Mojave Desert along the California State Route 14
corridor, about four miles from California City and 15 miles from the town of
Mojave. The Beacon Solar Energy Project would be situated on 2,012-acres of
private land that used to be an agricultural site. The project would produce
electricity using parabolic trough solar thermal technology. Thousands of
parabolic mirrors assembled in rows would receive and concentrate the solar
energy to produce steam for powering a steam turbine generator. If approved by
the Commission the project will begin construction in the third quarter of 2009,
with commercial operations targeted for the third quarter of 2011.
My Comments: They did not say what
utility would get the energy from this plant. The parabolic trough is what
I think will be the most successful. Perhaps we will see some day how much
energy this plant will produce.
Stirling
Engines Mirror- Solar Systems
Pictures are two views
of fields of Stirling Engines mounted on a mirror which focuses the sun's
photons onto the the engines mounted on the mirror assembly. The mirrors will
track the suns movement throughout the day.
 
On August 11, 2005,
Southern California Edison
announced an agreement to purchase
solar powered Stirling engines from
Stirling Energy Systems[5]
(SES) over a twenty year period and in quantity (20,000 units) sufficient
to generate 500 megawatts of electricity. These systems - to be installed on a
4,500 acre solar farm - will use mirrors to direct and concentrate sunlight onto
the engines which will in turn drive generators. Each Stirling engine-mirror
module assembly has a power capacity of 25 kWe (33.4 hp)
Stirling Energy Systems (SES)
is a systems integration and project management company that is developing
equipment for utility-scale renewable energy power plants and distributed
electric generating systems ("gensets"). SES is teamed with Kockums Submarine
Systems, NASA-Glenn Laboratories, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and The
Boeing Company for solar power plants. SES is positioned to become a premier
worldwide renewable energy technology company to meet the global demand for
renewable electric generating technologies through the commercialization of its
own Stirling cycle engine technology for solar and genset applications.
Stirling engines are powered by the expansion of a gas when
heated, followed by the compression of the gas when cooled. The Stirling engine
contains a fixed amount of gas which is transferred back and forth between a
"cold" and a "hot" end. The gasses used inside a Stirling engine never
leave the engine. There are no exhaust valves that vent high-pressure
gasses, as in a gasoline or diesel engine.
The Stirling engine receives the solar heat focused on the
outside of the hot piston wall and it is supplied to the inside working fluid by
conduction. The cold piston gas inside transfers its heat through the wall
to the outside heat sink. In this case the desert air.

The SES Solar Dish Stirling system is shaped much like large
satellite dishes (approximately 37’ in diameter) and covered with curved
mirrors. These solar dishes are programmed to always face the sun and focus that
energy on a collector in much the same way that a satellite dish focuses radio
waves on a tuner. This collector is connected to a Stirling engine which uses
the thermal power generated by the focused solar energy to heat liquid hydrogen
in a closed-loop system. The expanding hydrogen gas creates a pressure wave on
the pistons of the Stirling engine which spins an electric motor creating
electricity with no fuel cost or pollution. This technology is referred to as
solar thermal or concentrating solar power.
The SES Solar Dish Stirling system is shaped much like large
satellite dishes (approximately 37’ in diameter) and covered with curved
mirrors. These solar dishes are programmed to always face the sun and focus that
energy on a collector in much the same way that a satellite dish focuses radio
waves on a tuner. This collector is connected to a Stirling engine which uses
the thermal power generated by the focused solar energy to heat liquid hydrogen
in a closed-loop system. The expanding hydrogen gas creates a pressure wave on
the pistons of the Stirling engine which spins an electric motor creating
electricity with no fuel cost or pollution. This technology is referred to as
solar thermal or concentrating solar power.
SES maintains that the dish Stirling system is
technologically ready for use today. They have spent the last 17 years in
research and development, and are ready for mass deployment as soon as
sufficient investments and/or execution of power agreements makes mass
production possible.
SES expects that one dish on an annual basis can produce
60,000 kWh of electricity. Using these data supplied I calculate a
capacity factor of 27% for the system. There is only a few hours in the
winter season to generate energy and not a lot more in the Spring and Fall
seasons. Three months of Summer is the most productive hours and that is
not a lot. No system that only produces a capacity factor of 25% will be a
serious contender for energy production.
|
Stirling Energy Systems are planning to build two separate
solar farms, one with the capacity to generate 850 megawatts of electricity in
the Mojave Desert near Victorville, California, for SoCal Edison, and a
900-megawatt plant in the Imperial Valley, near Calexico, California, for SDG&E.
The utilities have signed 20-year deals to buy all the juice the farms can turn
out, and have options to expand the plants if they are successful.
"Without question, this will be the largest solar project
in the world," said Gil Alexander, a spokesman for SoCal Edison. "It will be
bigger than all U.S. solar-energy projects combined.
Bruce Osborn, Stirling Energy
Systems CEO, said his company's dishes are easy to maintain because the engine
is a closed system that never needs to be refilled -- an important factor for a
large-scale facility in the middle of the desert. In fact, the only resource it
consumes is "a little bit of water to wash the mirrors off every few weeks,"
Large Scale Solar Market Gets
$100 Million Boost
18th April 2008
Stirling Energy Systems, Inc. (SES), a Phoenix-based developer of
utility-scale solar powered electricity generation plants has announced an
agreement for NTR plc, a leading international developer and operator in
renewable energy and sustainable waste management, to invest $100 million and
take a controlling interest in the company.
My comments: A little bit of water to wash
the mirrors in the desert? They can wash thousands of these Stirling
Systems every two weeks with a little bit of water? It will take a continuous
stream of water every day to cover these units every two weeks. Also it has
never been clear to me how they cool the units in the desert. . The efficiency
is a function of the temperature difference between the hot cylinder and the
cold one.
Well Sandia National Lab has assembled
six units and tested them. They have set a record for thermal efficiency
of 31.25% compared to the old record of 29.4%. But the units will not be able to
operate at a capacity factor of greater than 25% during the year. They intend to
ultimately build 70,000 of these units for 1,750 MWe capacity.
Let's look at the finance of this project. Perhaps the capitol cost of $150,000 each
will come down under mass production. A
company is going to finance 100 million dollars to the project. Suppose that the
units can be manufactured for one fifth of the $150,000 original cost. That
brings to cost of a MWe system to. (70,000
units times $30,000 = $2,100,000,000.). And they have to buy the land and
install the units yet. The utilities that receive the energy will have to have
reserve system standing by since an intervening cloud cover will require
that the load be picked up or the system could go unstable due to that large of
a rapid energy loss.
The utilities are not taking a financial
liability since they only buy the electric energy generated. Some one must
finance the project. This type of
machines will require maintenance and repair. This could be quite expensive. I
cannot envision 70,000 single Stirling Engines operating mainantance free in the
desert.
Below is a news item in part.
Solar plant could replace plans for cow town
A half-dozen major producers of solar energy are looking
at the 3,000-acre site west of Hinkley as the potential location for as many as
five solar plants, each costing $300 million to build, and producing 100
megawatts of power each, said Henry Orlosky, CEO of Harper Lake LLC.
"With two other 80-megawatt solar plants nearby, this is a
site with a high index of solar radiation," he said. "Various solar companies,
including North Carolina-based Solargenix and Acciona Solar Power of Nevada, are
talking to us about building power plants here. "The
U.S. Department of Energy, working with Edison, pioneered commercial production
of solar power when it built the Solar One plant near Daggett in 1980.
My comment: Here is an example of a
group that plans solar plants with no knowledge of what they are talking about.
Solar One at Daggett, California was a total failure. It sits in the
desert as a pile of worthless junk. And various Solar companies would
consider spending $300 million on such a 100 MWe plant?. Moreover, Solar
One was only a 10 MWe sized plant and they could not even make it work. Would
you like to put your money in the above venture?
Tower Power
Solar II
The Solar One central tower research facility was completed
in 1981 and was operational from 1982 to 1986. Solar two added more mirrors and
was operational from 1995 to 1999.
i am not able to find the data which stated the
electric energy produced over the 1981-1999 time span. I suspect it was
very little.
This is a concentrated solar generating
plant located at Daggett, California. It is a
tower power system of 10 kWe maximum solar power rating. A field of mirrors focuses solar rays on a
tower that houses a flowing heat transfer fluid. The fluid picks up the
heat and transfers it to a steam-electric generating system. I will not
spend a lot time on this facility. It was an abject failure. It was originally
called Solar I. Solar I burned up in a fire on August 31, 1986 when 240,000
gallons of the heat transfer oil caught fire.
They restored it as Solar II using a molten salt heat
transport fluid. This too was a failure. I was a GE unit manager of a plant and
systems design when the Solar II project asked us to bid the engineering
analysis and design of the steam generator-turbine generator systems. We were
experienced in this field since the sodium cooled Fast Breeder Reactor has sodium
heated steam generators similarly to those required by the Solar II steam
generators. We analyzed the system and proposed that they needed a gas fired-
heated feed water heater to keep the salt molten during periods when the sun's
load is low. The sun is low at the start and ends of the day as the sun is
setting. They did not take our advice, nor did they give us the job.
Statement below by the DOE about Solar II.
It is my understanding that system that never really worked
and has been abandoned.

Solar
II successfully demonstrated the power tower concept, including the capability
to store energy economically for dispatch at periods of peak demand.
A few years later I was on my way to Arizona for
a vacation and stopped in to see the Solar II site. The guard would not let me
in, but he said that the molten salt froze and ruined the stream generators and
they hauled them from the site a short time ago. The was about 15 years ago, The unit never produced a
significant amount of energy. It stands abandoned in the desert, a quarter of a
billion dollar pile of junk. However, the National Renewable Energy
Laboratory reports that Solar II demonstrated continuous operation for nearly a
week, frequently at part load.
My comments: The below words appeared in a
press release. Did not say what happened to the plant. Below is what
did happen.
In the 1980s, a concentrating solar thermal demonstration
plant was built in Daggett, California that used an array of mirrors to focus
the Sun's energy to a single receiver mounted atop a central tower. It was
decommissioned in 1999.
Now parts of Solar II
are used as a gamma ray observatory, so the
project will continue to provide useful data to the scientific community, but it
does not supply any electric energy.
Here is what the DOE said about
Solar II
The Solar Two plant was a
retrofit of Solar One to demonstrate the advantages of molten salt for heat
transfer and thermal storage. Using its highly efficient molten-salt energy
storage system, Solar Two successfully demonstrated efficient collection of
solar energy and dispatch of electricity. It also demonstrated the ability to
routinely produce electricity during cloudy weather and at night. In one
demonstration, Solar Two delivered power to the grid for 24 hours a day for
almost seven consecutive days before cloudy weather interrupted operation.
After this series
they froze the molten salt heat transfer fluid and gave up the ghost.
This looks like a gross loser to me, but
hope springs eternally. This is suppose to be a new technology? I guess they are
not aware of the Tower power II failure described above. I cannot imagine who
would finance such a project. It snows in Colorado, panels covered with snow
would not reflect solar energy.
SkyFuel to use 'power tower,' salt to gather sun's
energy
Dec 7 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - The Pueblo
Chieftain, Colo. Should SkyFuel decide to locate a 1,000-megawatt
solar power plant near Del Norte, the company hopes to use a new
technology that would make solar power cheaper and easier to get to market.
The Department of Energy awarded the company a $435,000 grant at the end of
last month to continue research on its Linear Power Tower. The system uses a
Fresnel-lens style array of mirrors, the same style of lens commonly used in
flattened magnifying glasses, stop lights and lighthouses, said William
Felsher, vice president of project sales for the company. The style would
allow the company to lay its panels out flat close to the ground in a
North-South configuration, and tilt them side to side to catch the sun's daily
journey from East to West across the sky. The system is cheaper and easier to
maintain than systems using smaller, pole-mounted mirrors, which each must
have their own motors and mounting gear. The long thin panels reflect the
sun's light toward a single horizontal "tower" to gather the heat. The company
believes that the power towers, along with the high temperature and storage
capabilities of molten salt, will make its power less expensive and easier to
distribute to market.
Update about SkyFuel
NYC-based SkyFuel uses two concentrating solar power
technologies - Parabolic Trough and Linear Fresnel - that the sun's normal
radiation onto heat-absorbing pipes. This creates steam that can be used for
electric power generation or industrial processes.
Today PEWire reports that SkyFuel has raised $1.6M in a
first round from angel investors. It has already largely built out its
management team and says it expects to open a manufacturing facility in New
Mexico. The investment was organized by the boutique bank GC Andersen.
Well Governor Bill Richardson should
be happy about this announcement, but 1.6 million dollars is hardly seed money
for such a project. I wonder who will pay the cost of building such a
project.
Below is an
announcement in part:
Merger Lifts Solar Towers Prospects in US
MELBOURNE, Mar 19, 2007 /PRNewswire-FirstCall
Moves to merge Solar Tower power station development
interests into a wholly owned subsidiary of EnviroMission Limited (ASX: EVM)(US
OTC: EVOMY) is set to lift US Solar Tower development prospects via a
multi-national business development model proposed under the terms of the
merger.
Shareholder approval will be sought to merge US based SolarMission
Technologies, Inc. (SolarMission) with Melbourne based EnviroMission Limited (EnviroMission)
into a newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary of EnviroMission, to create a
single development vehicle with exclusive multi-national rights to develop Solar
Tower renewable energy power stations in global markets including Australia and
the US.
My comment: I wonder if they are aware of
the US experience with Solar Tower Power systems? I do not think this project
will ever get started.
Xcel Energy seeks more solar projects
Dec 8 - McClatchy-Tribune Business News Formerly
Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News - Karen Vigil The Pueblo Chieftain, Colo.
Xcel Energy announced this week that it is
requesting proposals for commercial, customer-sited solar installations as
part of its compliance with the Colorado Renewable Portfolio Standard.
The company is looking to produce 7,000 megawatt-hours per year in
new solar projects. Each proposal must be rated above 100 kilowatts and less
than 2 megawatts in capacity in the company's Colorado service territory.
Proposals are due and should include the price per solar-on-site renewable
energy credit and the number of credits per year. The company is issuing a
second request for proposals as required by the Colorado Public Utilities
Commission.
"This RFP demonstrates Xcel Energy's commitment to
meeting Colorado's renewable energy standard," said Fred Stoffel,
vice-president of marketing. "It also allows customers to take advantage of
the federal tax incentives allowed by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which
will expire at the end of 2007."
Bidders can find more information at
www.xcelenergy.com/solar .
My comment: To get 7,000
megawatt-hours per year they will have to bid at least two 2 MWe solar plants at
a total capital cost of about 35 million Dollars.
Here is is a parabolic mirror solar
system, the first in many years.
Acciona Connects
to the Nevada Grid the World's Largest Solar Thermal Plant in 16 Years
BOULDER
CITY, Nevada, Jun 07, 2007 -- BUSINESS WIRE
Acciona Solar
Power, a world leader in the design, development and ownership of solar thermal
technologies, has announced that its Nevada Solar One project, the
largest-capacity solar power plant built in the world in 16 years and the
third-largest of its kind, has begun supplying power to the Nevada Power grid.
The plant represents an investment of more than $250 million.
Acciona Solar Power, a majority-owned subsidiary of Acciona Energy, a
world leader in renewable energies, built Nevada Solar One over the course of 16
months. The 64-MW solar thermal power plant covers 400 acres in the Eldorado
Valley and utilizes large-scale, parabolic trough technology to enable heat
transfer from the sun's rays to ultimately generate up to 134 million kW hours
of electricity per year, enough to power 15,000 households annually.
All of the
plant's electricity production is being sold to Nevada Power Company and Sierra
Pacific Power Company under long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs). The PPAs
will ensure fixed costs for the electricity, making solar power an economically
feasible energy alternative over time.
My Comments: This plant is only 64 MWe with a
capacity factor of 23.9%. Its capital cost is $4,000 per KWe installed and
the energy from it would be 20 cents per KWh before taxes if it were not paid
for by the government. Its capitol cost per kWe is double that of a nuclear
plant and its energy output is only 6.4% of a normal nuclear sized power plant.
Its cost of energy is 20 times that of a nuclear plant.
(There will never be enough time for this
cost to be economical. But it is not $10,000 per kWe installed like photovoltaic
cells are.)
It is clear that this concept is not an
answer to our energy supply and I doubt that many more will be built.
First Solar to Supply Modules for 40 MW Solar Plant
First Solar, Inc. (Nasdaq:FSLR) announced today that it
will supply solar modules for a 40-megawatt solar power plant that will be
constructed in the Saxon region of Germany in the municipality of Brandis by
juwi solar GmbH. Upon completion, the project will be one of the largest
photovoltaic projects ever constructed. Project construction is scheduled to
begin in the second quarter of 2007 and is expected to be completed within 30
months.
The project represents an investment of 130 million EURO and will be financed by
Saxon LB. Upon completion, the project will utilize approximately 550,000 solar
modules and produce around 40 million kilowatt hours of clean power annually,
preventing an estimated 25,000 metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions from
being released into the environment.
My comment: The Germans are going
solar. If I calculated this right the cost this project in US dollars is 168
million dollars, The capacity factor of this installation is only 11 %.Not much
sun in Germany and much snow falls in the winter. Cost per installed kWe is
$4,225. This calculates to about 26 cents per kWh. Germany is said to be going
renewables, and it will cost them dearly to do so.
Return to Top
| |
|